• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 02/23/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.The patient reported that stimulation was down the leg where it was mainly being in the back.The patient reported that when she coughed she had some across her midsection.The patient reported that she had an mri on (b)(6) 2017 on the lower back.The patient reported that she had previous problems on the left side of the back but would go down right side so stimulation was to help with both sides.The patient reported that she had never had stimulation in leg and that this started after the mri.The patient also reported that she kept feeling vibration in the leg.The patient reported that she thought it was her phone but it wasn¿t.The patient reported that she never had the ever before.The patient reported that it was still working on back but now in the leg too.The patient reported that she got new phones before the mri and not working properly.The patient reported that the stimulation was more and more increased daily.The patient reported that on the day of the report she could feel it in both legs while talking on the phone where on the night prior to the report was only in one leg.No further complications anticipated.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that an appointment was set-up, the program was changed, and the new stimulation in the legs was resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key6450159
MDR Text Key71419170
Report Number3004209178-2017-06780
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109483
UDI-Public00643169109483
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/28/2016
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2017
Initial Date FDA Received03/31/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
05/30/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2017
10/02/2017
Date Device Manufactured05/12/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
-
-