• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS PHYT SLIDES; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS PHYT SLIDES; IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8298671
Device Problems High Test Results (2457); Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/11/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation determined that lower and higher than expected results were obtained from quality control fluids using vitros phyt micro slides on a vitros 5600 integrated system.The most likely assignable cause of the vitros tdm pv iii d5002 results of 35.2, 39.6, >40.0, and >40.0 ug/ml was the calibration associated with the results, as these results were obtained to verify a calibration event.The investigation was unable to identify an assignable cause for the remaining lower than expected tdm pv results that were obtained from a previous calibration.However, there was no evidence that vitros phyt slide lot 2614-0162-7383 or the vitros 5600 system malfunctioned.Historical quality control results obtained using slide lot 2614-0162-7383 were acceptable prior to, and after the event, with no actions taken to mitigate the issue.Finally, a phyt within-run precision test was within acceptable guidelines, indicating vitros slide lot 2614-0162-7383 is performing as intended on the vitros 5600 system.A sample related issue related to the vitros tdm pv fluids in use at the time of the events cannot be ruled out as contributing to the event.The customer was asked if improper pre-analytical sample handling could be the cause of the issue, however, the customer could neither rule out nor confirm if improper sample handling occurred.
 
Event Description
A customer obtained lower and higher than expected results from quality control fluids using vitros phenytoin (phyt) microslides on a vitros 5600 integrated system.Vitros tdm pv i x4558 results of 5.11, 5.26, 5.41 ug/ml vs.The expected result of 7.60 ug/ml.Vitros tdm pv iii d5002 results of 9.61, 13.4 16.7, 35.2, 39.6, >40.0, and >40.0 ug/ml vs.The expected result of 28.70 ug/ml.Biased results of the direction and magnitude observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if occurred undetected.These results were not reported from the laboratory and there was no allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report is number 3 of 10 mdr¿s for this event.Ten (10) 3500a forms are being submitted for this event as 10 devices were involved.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS PHYT SLIDES
Type of Device
IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
100 indigo creek drive
rochester NY 14626
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
513 technology blvd.
rochester NY 14652
Manufacturer Contact
james a stevens
100 indigo creek drive
rochester, NY 14626
5854533000
MDR Report Key6475106
MDR Text Key72783689
Report Number1319809-2017-00030
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/10/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2017
Device Catalogue Number8298671
Device Lot Number2614-0162-7383
Other Device ID Number10758750004690
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/12/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-