|
Catalog Number 810081 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 04/10/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 04/28/2017.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the additional information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please clarify the statement you made in file (b)(4), indicating related events: (mx001512) - (b)(4) and (mx001577) - (b)(4).As noted below each event occurred at a different time, which would indicate 3 different patient¿s thus the events cannot be related.If they are related please explain how and note that similarities in events do not relate files? what was the lot number of the device you are reporting? quantity indicates ni.Did the surgeon use one device that was noted to have a portion that detached? it was reported that a portion of the device detached during use.It is hard to tell in the picture you sent what specifically detached.Please explain did the mesh detach from the white sheath that covers the helical passer or did the centering loop detach or did the white sheath break or crack? will the device be returned, two different answers were marked on the complaint form?.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2017 and the mesh was implanted.During use a portion of the device was detached.The procedure was completed with another like device.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.Additional information has been requested.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was requested and the following was received: please clarify the statement you made in file (b)(4), indicating related events: ((b)(4).As noted below each event occurred at a different time, which would indicate 3 different patient¿s thus the events cannot be related.If they are related please explain how and note that similarities in events do not relate files? i commented that it was only a report that includes patient.What was the lot number of the device you are reporting? ni.Quantity indicates ni.Did the surgeon use one device that was noted to have a portion that detached? no, the surgeon did not know that the mesh had a defect of surgeon.It was reported that a portion of the device detached during use.It is hard to tell in the picture you sent what specifically detached.I don´t know how to call him to the edge of the mesh.According to what the surgeon says, it was the blue part.Will the device be returned, two different answers were marked on the complaint form? no.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No conclusion.The product evaluation has been done only with pictures.The product has not been sent for evaluation and the lot number is unknown.During production, inspections are performed by trained and certified operators to verify the mesh integrity and the presence of foreign matter or the size of particle belonging to product.During the surgery, the mesh was stretched, damaged.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|