• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 995
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Gradient Increase (1270)
Patient Problems Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Congestive Heart Failure (1783); Cardiac Enzyme Elevation (1838); Left Ventricular Dysfunction (1947)
Event Date 03/28/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: karimi a et al.High-risk trans-catheter aortic valve replacement in a failed freestyle valve with low coronary height cardiol ther.2017 mar 28.Doi: 10.1007/s40119-017-0088-4.Earliest date of publish used for event date.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information, it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.(b)(4).A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature of a (b)(6) year-old male patient with a bicuspid aortic valve who underwent implant of a medtronic freestyle stentless aortic root bioprosthesis (serial number not provided).Ten years following the valve implant, the patient presented with elevated cardiac enzymes and decompensated heart failure.Transthoracic echocardiogram (tte) revealed severe aortic insufficiency with an elevated mean gradient of 26mmhg and left ventricular dysfunction.An elongated mobile density was noted on the valve thought to be either a healed vegetation, as blood cultures were negative, or degenerative valve leaflet prolapse.Computed tomography (ct) scan showed the bioprosthetic to be calcified.Subsequently, a non-medtronic transcatheter bioprosthetic valve was implanted valve-in-valve.During the implant, it was noted that the pigtail was used as a marker due to the freestyle root not possessing a radiopaque ring marker or visible posts.Following the implant, the final root angiogram showed the aortic insufficiency was resolved.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the physician/author stated that medtronic product did not cause or contribute to the adverse events, and provided the valve size (27mm) without serial numbers, and the patient's weight ((b)(6)).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6530604
MDR Text Key73963577
Report Number2025587-2017-00713
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number995
Device Catalogue Number995
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient Weight79
-
-