• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ESS305
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by an other health professional and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), complication of device insertion ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), device deployment issue ("it remained stuck to both the insert and the catheter") and complication of device removal ("a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it") in a female patient who had essure (batch no.772491) inserted.On (b)(6) 2011, the patient had essure inserted.On the same day, the patient experienced device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal.At the time of the report, the device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device insertion, complication of device removal, device breakage and device deployment issue with essure.Company causality comment: this spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it.This event, interpreted as device breakage, is anticipated in the reference safety information for essure.In the present case the event occurred during essure insertion procedure, therefore causality with essure cannot be excluded.Although there was no reported death or serious health deterioration, this might have occurred under less fortunate circumstances and therefore case was regarded as a reportable incident.A product technical analysis and further information are expected.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On march 3, 2017, bayer received a cluster of essure complaint reports originating from the ansm, health authority of (b)(4), device vigilance database via legal proceedings.Following receipt, bayer consulted ansm in order to obtain the relevant case reference number information.On march 24, 2017, ansm provided the available corresponding case reference numbers to bayer.Upon receipt of this information bayer evaluated and processed the cluster of essure reports within the global safety database by april 12, 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by an other health professional and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), complication of device insertion ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), device deployment issue ("it remained stuck to both the insert and the catheter") and complication of device removal ("a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it") in a female patient who had essure (batch no.772491) inserted.On (b)(6) 2011, the patient had essure inserted.On the same day, the patient experienced device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal.At the time of the report, the device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device insertion, complication of device removal, device breakage and device deployment issue with essure.The list of device similar incidents contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus coded with the same medra preferred term.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on 23-jun-2017 for the following meddra preferred term: device breakage.The analysis in the global safety database revealed 1.639 cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 22-jun-2017: the reporter did not respond to final follow-up attempt.No further information expected.Company causality comment: other reportable incident at the time of reporting, there is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by an other health professional and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), complication of device insertion ("as soon as the catheter was withdrawn, a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it"), device deployment issue ("it remained stuck to both the insert and the catheter") and complication of device removal ("a metal wire remained stuck and it was impossible to remove it") in a female patient who had essure (batch no.772491) inserted.On (b)(6) 2011, the patient had essure inserted.On the same day, the patient experienced device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal.At the time of the report, the device breakage, complication of device insertion, device deployment issue and complication of device removal outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device insertion, complication of device removal, device breakage and device deployment issue with essure.The list of similar cases contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus with similar events coded in meddra.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on 23-oct-2017 for the following meddra preferred term: device breakage.The analysis in the global safety database revealed 1.824 cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 20-oct-2017: quality-safety evaluation of ptc.Incident: at the time of reporting, there is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k. shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd. p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key6534122
MDR Text Key74359130
Report Number2951250-2017-01830
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberESS305
Device Lot Number772491
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/03/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
10/20/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/03/2017
06/29/2017
11/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-