• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS205
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a physician and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("upon release of the insert,two pieces were detached of the distal part of the insert"), fallopian tube spasm ("tissue spasm in the ostium during placement of the left insert") and complication of device insertion ("the two fragments were removed using grasping forceps") in a female patient who received essure (ess205) (batch no.624277).On (b)(6) 2007, the patient started essure (ess205).On (b)(6) 2007, the same day after starting essure (ess205), the patient experienced device breakage, fallopian tube spasm and complication of device insertion.At the time of the report, the device breakage and complication of device insertion had resolved and the fallopian tube spasm outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for device breakage, fallopian tube spasm and complication of device insertion with essure (ess205).Company causality comment: a female patient had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and it was reported that upon release of the insert, two pieces were detached of the distal part of the insert (seen as device breakage).The event device breakage is regarded as anticipated according to the reference safety information for essure.In this particular case, it was reported that tissue spasm in the ostium during placement of the left insert occurred.The two fragments were removed using grasping forceps.As the device breakage occurred during essure insertion procedure, a causal relationship with essure cannot be excluded.This case was regarded as other reportable incident due to the device breakage, as although it did not lead to death or serious health deterioration this might have occurred under less fortunate circumstances.Further information and product technical analysis are being sought.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On march 3, 2017, bayer received a cluster of essure complaint reports originating from the ansm, health authority of (b)(4), device vigilance database via legal proceedings.Following receipt, bayer consulted ansm in order to obtain the relevant case reference number information.On march 24, 2017, ansm provided the available corresponding case reference numbers to bayer.Upon receipt of this information bayer evaluated and processed the cluster of essure reports within the global safety database by april 12, 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This spontaneous case was reported by a physician and describes the occurrence of device breakage ("upon release of the insert, two pieces were detached of the distal part of the insert"), fallopian tube spasm ("tissue spasm in the ostium during placement of the left insert") and complication of device insertion ("the two fragments were removed using grasping forceps") in a female patient who had essure (ess205) (batch no.624277) inserted.On (b)(6) 2007, the patient had essure (ess205) inserted.On the same day, the patient experienced device breakage, fallopian tube spasm and complication of device insertion.At the time of the report, the device breakage and complication of device insertion had resolved and the fallopian tube spasm outcome was unknown.The reporter provided no causality assessment for complication of device insertion, device breakage and fallopian tube spasm with essure (ess205).The list of device similar incidents contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus coded with the same medra preferred term.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on 12-jun-2017 for the following meddra preferred term: device breakage.The analysis in the global safety database revealed 1.639 cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 9-jun-2017: device evaluation received.Company causality comment: other reportable incident.At the time of reporting, there is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k. lamberson
100 bayer blvd.
p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key6534748
MDR Text Key74306149
Report Number2951250-2017-01791
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/19/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2009
Device Model NumberESS205
Device Lot Number624277
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/03/2017
Initial Date FDA Received05/01/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/02/2017
06/19/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-