According to the report: "as discussed with doctor, he said that all the surgery went well and they placed onx aortic valve size 23 in the patient¿s heart.When they closed the heart, they have checked patient¿s heart with eco machine and one of the leaflet wasn't moving at that time.Doctor had to reopen the aorta and in order to reach onx valve and replace it with the nearest size of onx aortic valve." the reported event involves an onxa-23 with the serial number (b)(4).Multiple attempts were made to complainant to retrieve additional information with no success.The onxa-23 valve, serial number (b)(4) was evaluated.The sub-assembly inspections and component dimensional inspection indicate that the valve meets all specifications and that the reported event could be contributed to physiological interference.A manufacturing review was performed for the valve.It was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications.All lots passed functional testing and met release specifications.No non-conformances or deviations were noted.A review was performed of the available information.Onxa-23, serial number (b)(4) was implanted/explanted on (b)(6) 2017.After closing the aorta at surgery, an echocardiogram indicated that one of the two leaflets was not moving.The valve was removed and replaced with another on-x valve (unidentified).The explanted valve was returned to the manufacturer for analysis where dimensional and functional tests report all normal readings.The most likely cause of an immobile leaflet for a valve that is otherwise fully within specifications is some sort of anatomic or physical interference.The site reports do not identify any such interference; however, there is not enough information.By extension, not enough information is presented to ascertain what, if any, relationship the valve has to the immobility of its leaflet.
|