• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Inadequate Pain Relief (2388)
Event Date 01/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Caller was implanted with a spinal cord stimulator on (b)(6) 2016 for pain.On (b)(6) 2016, she met with her doctor and medtronic representation to turn on the stimulator.When the stimulator was turned on the stimulation was felt on the wrong side of the body.After several attempts it was decided the leads were placed in the wrong side of the body and will require a revision and a date was set for (b)(6) 2016.A week later caller was informed by the doctor that she may be referred to a neurosurgeon for the implant of a paddle instead of a lead stimulator.Caller said the surgeon stated that she should have had a pump rather than a spinal stimulator.On (b)(6) a revision of the lead took place but the paddle was not required.Caller was informed that the leads are okay but is required to be repositioned.Caller returned to the doctor's office to turn on the lead after revision and there was still a problem with stimulation.After several attempts, it was concluded that the client's scoliosis prevents the leads to work as intended because as she moves the leads also moves preventing stimulation.After several tests it was decided that a pump would be implanted and the stimulator will be explanted.Caller is still experiencing pain and the leads are still implanted.The leads cannot be used but it need to be charged from time to time until explant.Caller believe a 3rd surgery could have been avoided if her x-ray's were properly checked before surgery.It has now been determined that she would be a good candidate for a pump after a pump trial three weeks ago.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Type of Device
SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC
MDR Report Key6553711
MDR Text Key74822483
Report NumberMW5069618
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/08/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number97714
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received05/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient Weight54
-
-