Caller was implanted with a spinal cord stimulator on (b)(6) 2016 for pain.On (b)(6) 2016, she met with her doctor and medtronic representation to turn on the stimulator.When the stimulator was turned on the stimulation was felt on the wrong side of the body.After several attempts it was decided the leads were placed in the wrong side of the body and will require a revision and a date was set for (b)(6) 2016.A week later caller was informed by the doctor that she may be referred to a neurosurgeon for the implant of a paddle instead of a lead stimulator.Caller said the surgeon stated that she should have had a pump rather than a spinal stimulator.On (b)(6) a revision of the lead took place but the paddle was not required.Caller was informed that the leads are okay but is required to be repositioned.Caller returned to the doctor's office to turn on the lead after revision and there was still a problem with stimulation.After several attempts, it was concluded that the client's scoliosis prevents the leads to work as intended because as she moves the leads also moves preventing stimulation.After several tests it was decided that a pump would be implanted and the stimulator will be explanted.Caller is still experiencing pain and the leads are still implanted.The leads cannot be used but it need to be charged from time to time until explant.Caller believe a 3rd surgery could have been avoided if her x-ray's were properly checked before surgery.It has now been determined that she would be a good candidate for a pump after a pump trial three weeks ago.
|