• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS BROVIAC 4.2 FR SINGLE-LUMEN CV CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS BROVIAC 4.2 FR SINGLE-LUMEN CV CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF; PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Backflow (1064); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/18/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of huav0281 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the facility that the broviac ballooned when it was flushed.It was stated there was ballooning at the junction of the protective clamping sleeve and the catheter.It was noted by the nurse doing the repair that there were two previous repairs on the broviac.Previously there was not enough room to repair above the first repair, so a second repair was added and gi was notified.They also stated that there appeared to be blood in the outer catheter close to the insertion site.They stated the catheter did flush, but it was not able to draw blood, so they did not obtain cultures.The repair was placed in small griplock and dressing is covering the entire repair.The patient had the broviac replaced on (b)(6) 2017.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of ballooning in the catheter was confirmed and the cause appeared to be use related.The product returned for evaluation was broviac repair catheter.The sample contained two regions of repair indicating it was at least the second repair for the original device.Gross visual evaluation confirmed blood and dressing residue indicating product use.Tactile evaluation revealed extreme tensile weakness in the catheter tubing just distal of the clamping oversleeve.The sample was patent to infusion using water and a 12ml syringe and no ballooning manifested during normal flow testing.Upon purposeful pressurization of the sample the catheter did balloon in the previously identified region of tensile weakness.During the pressurization a thinner region of catheter was observed in the balloon region.The state of the observed in the returned sample was characteristic of over-pressurization damage.This can occur through the use of syringes smaller than 10ml, by flushing against an occlusion, or due to excessive force applied during infusion procedures.Additionally, it is possible that the sample was accidentally pulled in this region which can also cause weakening of the catheter and manifest as material ballooning during infusion.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the facility that the broviac ballooned when it was flushed.They stated there was ballooning at the junction of the protective clamping sleeve and the catheter.It was noted by the nurse doing the repair that there were two previous repairs on the broviac.Previously there was not enough room to repair above the first repair, so a second repair was added and gi was notified.They also stated that there appears to be blood in the outer catheter close to the insertion site.They stated the catheter did flush, but it was not able to draw blood, so they did not obtain cultures.The repair was placed in small griplock and dressing is covering the entire repair.The patient is scheduled to have the broviac replaced on (b)(6) 2017.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BROVIAC 4.2 FR SINGLE-LUMEN CV CATHETER PEEL-APART INTRODUCER KIT WITH SURECUFF
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS, IMPLANTED, LONG TERM INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
teresa johnson
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225435
MDR Report Key6556724
MDR Text Key74998796
Report Number3006260740-2017-00588
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741051807
UDI-Public(01)00801741051807(17)190728(10)HUAV0281
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K830256
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/28/2019
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number0600520
Device Lot NumberHUAV0281
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/25/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age11 MO
-
-