• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL DELTAMAXX - PLATINUM MICROCOIL; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL DELTAMAXX - PLATINUM MICROCOIL; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DMX18185520
Device Problems Stretched (1601); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/17/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Common device name: krd/hcg.This complaint met mdr reporting criteria on 5/4/2017 when the analysis found coil stretching and buckling.Conclusion: lot c19940 was returned for analysis.There was unreported damage of the resheathing tool being returned severed and off the introducer sheath with the distal section of the resheathing tool not being returned.The resheathing tools fracture is ductile in nature requiring external force.No material defects were found.Unreported damage of the device positioning unit (dpu) protruding outside the sheath located 78.5 centimeters off the distal tip of the green introducer.No sheath damage was found at the protrusion site.The proximal section of the coil has unreported stretching and buckling damage.The remainder of the coil is undamaged.No manufacturing defects were found.The circumstances of how and when all the unreported damage occurred cannot be determined.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.The complaint of the resheathing difficulty was confirmed; however, there was confirmed unreported stretching and buckling of the coil.Due to multiple unreported damages found, and the failure to return the distal section of the resheathing tool, the root cause of the resheathing difficulty cannot be determined; however, the evidence as received highly suggests that the coil had to have been advanced when the dpu protruded outside the sheath which also may have produced the coil damage found.The most likely contributing factor of the coil protruding outside the sheath which prevented the resheathing appears to be, in part, interference in the form of a binding action or an anchoring effect.The unknown interference most likely caused the dpu to protrude outside the sheath which prevented the resheathing of the unit.In addition, without the return of the distal severed section of the resheathing tool, the identification or the return of the unknown microcatheter and the rhv used in the procedure, it cannot be determined if these components contributed to the complaint event.Since there was no evidence of a manufacturing issue found during the analysis, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is an initial/final mdr report.
 
Event Description
As reported by a healthcare professional during coil embolization of an endoleak, a deltamaxx (dmx18185520/ c19940) could not be re-sheathed and analysis revealed the proximal section of the coil had unreported stretching and buckling damage, and there was a lot of tension when attempting to advance a deltamaxx (dmx18165020/ c18057) from the sheath.The first coil had been advanced into the sac, but the doctor did not like the catheter position.They attempted to re-sheath the coil, but the coil could not be re-sheathed.The second coil was advanced, but the doctor did not like the shape it was taking, so the coil was successfully re-sheathed to reposition the catheter.When they attempted to un-sheath the second coil, they felt a lot of tension when trying to advance the coil from the sheath.They exchanged the coil to a different coil.Neither of the devices appeared to be visibly damaged in any way.There were no adverse patient issues.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DELTAMAXX - PLATINUM MICROCOIL
Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel
SZ 
Manufacturer Contact
karen anigbo
821 fox lane
san jose, CA 95131
5088288374
MDR Report Key6557277
MDR Text Key74997255
Report Number2954740-2017-00101
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier10878528001833
UDI-Public(01)10878528001833(17)180721(10)C19940
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120274
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/10/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/21/2018
Device Catalogue NumberDMX18185520
Device Lot NumberC19940
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/28/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/04/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-