It was reported that during advancement of the delivery system to a severely calcified lesion in the external iliac artery via the right groin and during deployment of the stent, resistance was felt.Therefore, the delivery system was pulled back and the stent deployed but appeared to be foreshortened.An additional stent was placed in overlap with the first stent to complete the procedure successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
|
The lot history records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.There is no indication for a manufacturing-related failure.On the basis of the evaluation of the returned device and the images provided, the alleged stent foreshortening could not be confirmed.A force transmitting component of the grip was found to be broken.The point in time of the breakage is unknown; the reported resistance upon deployment may have led to the breakage.The thumb slider of the delivery system was found to have been fully activated and functioning upon sample receipt which indicates that the user finalized the deployment by using the thumb slider.Potential contributing factors to the reported event have been considered.Previous investigations of similar complaints were reviewed.The stent was difficult to deploy and a component inside the grip was found to be broken.This type of event may be related to a difficult vessel anatomy leading to friction increase and subsequent deployment difficulties.In this case, friction increase was felt during the procedure and the vessel was severely calcified.The alleged stent foreshortening may be a consequence of the difficult deployment.An inadvertent movement of the hand during release force increase, highly calcified vessels, the vessel anatomy, incorrect holding of the delivery system during stent release or an insufficient pre-dilation may be contributing factors to a stent foreshortening.Reportedly, the lesion had been pre-dilated.On the basis of the information available and the evaluation of images and the sample, a definitive root cause for the reported complaint could not be determined.The ifu supplied with this device sufficiently describes the correct stent placement procedure.Also the ifu states: "if excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system as possible, and replace with a new unit." and "remove slack from the delivery system catheter held outside the patient." in addition, the ifu indicates that pre-dilation of the lesion should be performed by using standard techniques.
|
It was reported that during advancement of the delivery system to a severely calcified lesion in the external iliac artery via the right groin and during deployment of the stent, resistance was felt.Therefore, the delivery system was pulled back and the stent was deployed but appeared to be foreshortened.An additional stent was placed in overlap with the first stent to complete the procedure successfully.There was no reported patient injury.
|