• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. VERSAPOINT LOOP ELECTRODE ACCESSORY; HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. VERSAPOINT LOOP ELECTRODE ACCESSORY; HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 01985
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Uterine Perforation (2121); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Blood Loss (2597); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 05/02/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the additional information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The patient demographic info: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure date of initial surgical procedure.The diagnosis and indication for the initial surgical procedure? what were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications.Will the electrode be returned, return date, tracking information? what is physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? does the surgeon believe the generator contributed to the event? are any photos available?.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent a hysteroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2017 and an electrosurgical device was used.During the procedure, the patient moved like if she was electrocuted and the surgeon perforated the uterine.The surgeon is not sure if this happened due to electrosurgical device use.The patient was taken off the table.Coelioscopy has been proceeded and it has been found that one vessel near to iliac vessel was perforated and one laparotomy was done to stop the bleeding.Additional information has been requested.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted and the batch met all finished goods release criteria.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: date of initial surgical procedure - (b)(6)2017.The diagnosis and indication for the initial surgical procedure? - hysteroscopy and resection.What were current symptoms following the index surgical procedure? onset date ? - na / the patient suddenly moved / jumped as if she received an electric discharge, she took off from the operating table.The hysteroscope was in the hand of the surgeon and due to this event, the surgeon has perforated the patient uterus.A coelioscopy has been proceed and a venous wound near the external right iliac vein was observed.The bleeding was important so a laparotomy was performed.The electrode was used with a versapoint generator.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications - na.Will the electrode be returned, return date, tracking information? - yes.No tracking information for the moment.What is physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? - not available at this time.Are any photos available? - no.Does the surgeon believe the generator contributed to the event? no more information than the ones provided in the complaint.Does the surgeon believe the generator contributed to the event? no more information than the ones provided in the complaint.Patient status: no complication.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial investigation/inspection highlighted that there was a break in the contact former of the device connector and a small area of damage to the heat shrink.The device passed capacitance and continuity testing and with the device connected to a generator via a modified cord.Activation testing in both cut and coag modes was conducted successfully including a simulated use test.It is was considered that the damage in insulation could have caused electrical shorting between the electrode shaft and the assembled resectoscopic sheath, this in turn could have caused the shocks experienced by the patient.Dielectric strength testing could not detect a breakdown in the dielectric barrier of the device.In summary none of the testing carried out has revealed a fault or weakness with the device that could be linked to nerve stimulation.It is possible that the incident reported by the customer could be attributed to other equipment or connecting cables used during surgery, but it has not been possible to substantiate this possibility without having all components used within the surgery returned for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSAPOINT LOOP ELECTRODE ACCESSORY
Type of Device
HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-GYRUS MEDICAL LTD
fortran road, st. mellons
cardiff CF3 O LT
UK   CF3 OLT
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
route 22 west po box 151
somerville, NJ 08876
9082182792
MDR Report Key6583119
MDR Text Key75700748
Report Number2210968-2017-32214
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K040302
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/04/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number01985
Device Lot NumberUGY1610163
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/07/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient Weight70
-
-