Model Number PVS23 |
Device Problems
Gradient Increase (1270); Perivalvular Leak (1457); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
Patient Problems
Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Death (1802)
|
Event Date 04/26/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Due to limited information received to date the manufacturer is reporting in a conservative manner.Patient death occurred post operative after explant of pvs 23m.Not yet returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2017 pvs 23m was implanted.Intra-operative echo displayed paravalvular leak on the non cusp and leaflet fluttering on the right cusp leaflet, with a mean gradient of 40mmhg.The patient was put back on crossclamp and the aortotomy re-opened.The physician's initial inspection showed a good position of the valve.Cold slush applied to root and valve removed using shodded hemostats and z maneuver.The annulus was inspected for further calcium, and a small chunk of calcium was removed in one area.The physician resized for the same size valve and then noted ridge of calcium in root and elected to implant an edwards 21 magna.The manufacturer has been notified that patient death occurred post operative.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Updated information for follow up 1: date of patient death.Additional x clamp and cpb time.
|
|
Event Description
|
An additional 85 minutes of cpb time and 35 minutes x-clamp was added to the procedure due to the event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the steady flow test prior to release for the perceval sutureless aortic heart valve model (b)(4) was performed.The review confirmed the absence of any coaptation anomalies, and the valve met all acceptance criteria of the steady flow test inspection, the principal device functionality test, at the time of release.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Confirmation was received that the device is not available for analysis.As such, no device investigation can be performed and the root cause of this event cannot be determined.Based on the steady flow test review performed previously, no evidence of device deficiency was identified.Furthermore, according to the event narrative provided, a "chunk" of residual calcium was identified following explant of the perceval valve, and subsequently removed.Ultimately, an edwards valve was implanted because a ridge of calcium was still present in the annulus.According to the perceval ifu "eccentric/bulky protruding intraluminal calcifications must be removed" prior to implant of the perceval valve.It is therefore possible that this event arose from inadequate decalcification of the annulus and failure to follow the instructions in the ifu.Device not available for return.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|