MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 1; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 180611 |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Joint Disorder (2373)
|
Event Date 05/08/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The following devices were also listed in this report: mako x3 uni onlay tibial insert size 1 - 9 mm; cat# 180731-2; lot# ml2a63.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Additional information has been requested.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Sales rep reported a revision of a left uni knee due to pain.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: lot #, expiration date; manufacturing date.An event regarding pain & revision involving an mako baseplate was reported.The event was not confirmed.Visual, dimensional and functional inspection were not performed as the item was not returned.The provide medical records were submitted to a clinical consultant who indicated: "the patient experienced progression of her primary disease-osteoarthritis ¿ in the medial aspect of her knee.Surgeons records indicate this level of medial disease was not present prior to the pkr.No xrays were available for review.There is no evidence for defect in the implants or their manufacture." review of the device history records indicates devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There has been no other event for this lot.The event could not be confirmed nor the root cause determined since insufficient information was provided.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated that the patient experienced progression of her primary disease-osteoarthritis ¿ in the medial aspect of her knee but the surgeons records indicate this level of medial disease was not present prior to the pkr and there is no evidence for defect in the implants or their manufacture.A capa trend analysis was conducted for the reported failure mode and concluded pain may result from other factors not necessarily related to the device.Further information such as return of device, pre- and post-op xrays, office notes, operative reports, patient history, histopathology report & follow-up notes are needed to investigate this event further.If devices and/or additional information become available, this investigation will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
Sales rep reported a revision of a left uni knee due to pain.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|