Catalog Number S-50-060-120-P6 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Positioning Failure (1158)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/15/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a 90% stenosis in the mid right superficial femoral artery (sfa) with no tortuosity and moderate calcification.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 5.0 x 60 mm armada 35 balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) at 8 atmospheres.A 6f, 65 cm guiding sheath was inserted in the left femoral artery and a 5 x 60 mm 6f supera stent delivery system (sds) was advanced on a ht connect guide wire to the lesion.When the stent was deployed, it deployed in the sheath.The sds was pulled out of the sheath, but the nosecone separated from the catheter.The stent and the nosecone remained inside the sheath.A 6f standard length guiding sheath (shorter than the first sheath) was inserted in the right femoral artery and a 5.5 x 60 mm 6f supera stent was successfully deployed in the lesion.It was stating that the first sheath remained in the left femoral access site until the procedure was completed and both guiding sheaths were removed at the same time.It was confirmed that the stent and nosecone were inside the sheath and there were no pieces of the device left inside the anatomy.The physician concluded that the 6f 65 cm sheath initially used was too long.There were no adverse patient effects or clinically significant delay in the procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The tip separation was confirmed.The deployment difficulties were unable to be confirmed as the stent had already been fully deployed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The evaluation determined that the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|