If implanted, give date: unknown if the lens was implanted.If explanted, give date: unknown if the lens was implanted and unknown if explanted.Device evaluation: the intraocular lens (iol) was returned at the manufacturing site inside the lens case but it was not correctly positioned.Visual inspection at 10x microscope magnification showed loose particles and viscoelastic residue on the lens surface.The haptics were observed distorted.The customer's reported complaint was verified.However, it was not possible to determine if the distortion of the haptics was related to how the lens was positioned within the case.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) adequately provides instructions and precautions along with warnings for the proper use and handling of the device.The dfu states to examine the lens thoroughly to ensure particles have not become attached to it, and examine the lens optical surfaces for other defects.As a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue was verified.All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|
The customer confirmed the following requested information: here was no patient contact with the intraocular lens (iol).The doctor used a backup iol.There was no incision enlargement, sutures, or vitrectomy.The patient was fine after the surgery.No issues were observed.Note: based on the additional information reported above, this event is no longer considered reportable.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to abbott medical optics has been submitted.
|