• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

KANEKA CORPORATION LACRIFAST; LACRIMAL STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LF2-R090
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
- the concerned device "lacrifast" is not distributed in us under this device name, but is identical to the device "lacriflow lacrimal stent" distributed in us under 510(k) # k120886.- we originally found this information on 5/25/2017 in a preliminary program of (b)(6), scheduled in this july, by a title of presentation.We made an interview to the author of the presentation on 6/7/2017 to confirm the event subject to the presentation more in detail.According to the dr.Interviewed, the event occurred about one year before (in 2016) and the physician, who performed the actual procedure, was moved out of this facility.The dr.Interviewed provided us with the available information of the case described in this report.- the expiry of the device is for 3 years.As the lot no.Of the concerned device was not available, the device history records (dhr) of the devices manufactured since its first production in 2015 till the end of 2016, where the device concerned should be included, and confirmed that the device met its material, assembling and product specifications.- the physician in charge commented that this problem was not due to any device failure but to their procedural problem by making a false passage and not being able to retrieve the device appropriately.- we speculated the cause of torn off the tip of the tube and remained in the patient as follows: as described above in "describe event or problem", the tube insertion by using the bougie created a false passage in the occluded nasal duct.The tip portion was stuck tightly in the false passage, and was torn off by an excessive tensile force while the physician forcibly pulled the tube out of the patent.We determine, as commented by the physician in charge, the problem was caused not by any defect of the device but by the handling issue of the user.
 
Event Description
This device (lacrifast) was employed to treat the epiphora due to nasal duct blockage of a pediatric female patient.While inserting this lacrimal duct tube into the nasal duct, the physician realized that a false passage was created.The physician tried to remove the tube but the tube could not be pulled back.Accordingly, the physician made an incision of the lacrimal sac and pulled back the tube, and then, the tip of the tube was torn off and remained in the patient, since the tip of the tube was entered deep into and stuck in the tissues.The physician gave up to remove the remained tip portion out of the patient, and placed a new lacrimal duct tube in the nasal duct successfully to complete the operation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LACRIFAST
Type of Device
LACRIMAL STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
KANEKA CORPORATION
2-3-18
nakanoshima, kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8 288
JA  530-8288
Manufacturer Contact
kazuhiko inoue
2-3-18
nakanoshima,kita-ku
osaka, osaka 530-8-288
JA   530-8288
31814120
MDR Report Key6645805
MDR Text Key77840359
Report Number9614654-2017-00007
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OKS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLF2-R090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/25/2017
Initial Date FDA Received06/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-