(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: visual inspections were performed on the returned device.The tip detachment was confirmed.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined that the tip detachment was the result of inadvertent mishandling and there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that during device preparation, while wiping down the device, the tip detached without reported resistance.There was no patient involvement.The device was not used.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|