The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of reax1618 showed one other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.The complaints for this lot number (reax1618) have been reported from the same (b)(4) facility.
|
It was reported by the nurse that the catheter was in normal integrity by examination before catheter placement.It was found that drawing could not be conducted during catheter placement.It was stated that after multiple adjustments, the nurse was still unable to draw.The catheter was thus changed.Drawing still could not be conducted in vitro after taking out the catheter, along with difficult injection.No patient harm was reported.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the catheter failed to aspirate was confirmed, but the cause is unknown.A 4 fr s/l groshong picc was returned for investigation.One groshong s/l 4 fr picc was received with the stylet in the lumen.The hang tag was still attached to the catheter.The two-piece connector was received in two pieces separate from the catheter.No blood residue was observed in the catheter.Repeated functional tests of the catheter confirmed that the valve failed to open inward for aspiration both with and without the stylet.The valve opened outward during infusion and no leaks were detected in the catheter.A microscopic examination of the valve cut showed nothing remarkable.The valve length was within specification.This could be associated with insufficient lubricant on the valve.It is unknown if the lubricant was affected by the clinical procedure.At this time, based on the condition of the returned sample, it is unknown what prevented the valve from opening for aspiration.No further action is required because the complainant event could not be related to a deficiency in product manufacture or deficiency while under correct product use.
|
It was reported by the nurse that the catheter was in normal integrity by examination before catheter placement.It was found that drawing could not be conducted during catheter placement.It was stated that after multiple adjustments, the nurse was still unable to draw.The catheter was thus changed.Drawing still could not be conducted in vitro after taking out the catheter, along with difficult injection.No patient harm was reported.
|