• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. FEMORAL TRIAL SLAPHAMMER; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. FEMORAL TRIAL SLAPHAMMER; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 111140
Device Problems Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/24/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history records indicates that the reported devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.The complaint history review indicated that there were no similar events for the reported lot.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
The tip of the slap hammer broke off when being used to extract the patellofemoral trial from the femur.Update: "trial could no longer be extracted with the slap hammer considering the tip was stuck in the trial.Unable to get tip out of the trial.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: device returned to manufacturer on.An event regarding "fractured tip" involving a femoral trial slaphammer was reported.The event was confirmed.Material analysis was performed and concluded that "the slaphammer tip fractured in overload.Intergranular fracture morphologies were observed on the slaphammer.The slaphammer met the drawing requirement for hardness.Eds showed the slaphammer was consistent with 465 ph stainless steel alloy.It is recommended look into the heat treatment and hardness requirement for the 465 ph ss slaphammer." medical records received and evaluation: not performed as medical records were not provided for review.A device history review confirmed all devices accepted into finished goods conformed to specification.No other events were reported for the lot indicated.The investigation concluded that based on the material analysis that: the slaphammer tip fractured in overload.Intergranular fracture morphologies were observed on the slaphammer.
 
Event Description
The tip of the slaphammer broke off when being used to extract the patellofemoral trial from the femur.Update: "trial could no longer be extracted with the slaphammer considering the tip was stuck in the trial.Unable to get tip out of the trial.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FEMORAL TRIAL SLAPHAMMER
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
brian lauro
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6659892
MDR Text Key78186277
Report Number3005985723-2017-00263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number111140
Device Lot Number06020316
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/23/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/08/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-