• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE INNOVA¿; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE INNOVA¿; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Model Number H74939293061830
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Stretched (1601); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/31/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the shaft detached, the stent partially deployed, and the stent became damaged.The 100% stenosed, severely calcified, and severely tortuous target lesion was located in the left superficial femoral artery (sfa).A 6 x 180 x 130 innova¿ stent was selected for use.Over a period of several hours, a 0.014 guidewire was crossed to the lesion area and poba was performed.After poba, the physician changed to a 0.035 guidewire in order to deliver the stent, but the 0.035 guidewire was unable to cross the lesion area.So, the 0.014 guidewire was crossed to the lesion again and poba was performed.After that, delivery using the 0.035 guidewire was discontinued and this stent was delivered to the lesion area along with the 0.014 guidewire.High force was required to turn the thumbwheel.After 5-7 cm of delivery, an abnormal sound was heard during deployment from inside the thumbwheel and the stent was unable to further deploy with the thumbwheel.The pull grip was the only way to expand the stent.The silver outer sheath of the shaft was found to be detached.The stent was forcibly placed inside the patient¿s body by directly pulling out the system.The stent became stretched about 10-12 cm elongating from 18cm to about 30cm.Repair was attempted by performing apposition using a balloon.Poba was performed but apposition was unable to be performed.The procedure was completed with the vasculature totally occluded.There were no additional patient complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.:returned product consisted of an innova self-expanding stent delivery system (sds) and no other devices.The outer sheath, middle shaft, inner liner and the remainder of the device were examined for damage.The outer sheath showed multiple kinks and buckling.The mid-shaft, proximal inner and the inner liner were completely separated from the device when returned.A kink was noticed on the mid-shaft approximately 69cm from the marker band.A kink was noticed on the inner liner at the proximal inner distal end.The handle was opened to inspect for additional damage.It was noticed that the mid-shaft had separated from the retainer clip.The inner liner was also separated from the clip.No additional damage was noticed.The stent was not returned in the device.No damage was noticed inside of the handle.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable cause of the reported difficulties may be due interaction with another device.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that the shaft detached, the stent partially deployed, and the stent became damaged.The 100% stenosed, severely calcified, and severely tortuous target lesion was located in the left superficial femoral artery (sfa).A 6 x 180 x 130 innova¿ stent was selected for use.Over a period of several hours, a 0.014 guidewire was crossed to the lesion area and poba was performed.After poba, the physician changed to a 0.035 guidewire in order to deliver the stent, but the 0.035 guidewire was unable to cross the lesion area.So, the 0.014guidewire was crossed to the lesion again and poba was performed.After that, delivery using the 0.035 guidewire was discontinued and this stent was delivered to the lesion area along with the 0.014 guidewire.High force was required to turn the thumbwheel.After 5-7 cm of delivery, an abnormal sound was heard during deployment from inside the thumbwheel and the stent was unable to further deploy with the thumbwheel.The pull grip was the only way to expand the stent.The silver outer sheath of the shaft was found to be detached.The stent was forcibly placed inside the patient¿s body by directly pulling out the system.The stent became stretched about 10-12 cm elongating from 18cm to about 30cm.Repair was attempted by performing apposition using a balloon.Poba was performed but apposition was unable to be performed.The procedure was completed with the vasculature totally occluded.There were no additional patient complications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INNOVA¿
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key6660570
MDR Text Key78175958
Report Number2134265-2017-06102
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P140028
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/01/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/22/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2019
Device Model NumberH74939293061830
Device Catalogue Number39293-06183
Device Lot Number19589364
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/07/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/29/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/15/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-