Device evaluated by manufacturer: returned product consisted of a comet wire separated into 2 segments.The proximal shaft and the distal portion were returned.The shaft was separated in 1 place.The total proximal shaft length that was returned was 155cm.The length of the distal portion returned was 30cm which equals 185cm.The tip had a slight bend to it, most likely from the shaping from the physician.The sensor port was clear.Functional testing of the device could not be completed due to the separation of the shaft.Scanning electron microscopy (sem) analysis showed 1st row adjacent to distal end of fracture, likely resulted from an etching process and not wire separation.Some ductile dimple surface was observed on both distal and proximal wire separation.Overview sem images of distal and proximal ends of fracture indicate a bend overload failure.The fracture occurred approximately 30 cm from distal tip.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause was unable to be determined.(b)(4).
|