• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BEDWETTING STORE MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BEDWETTING STORE MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 06/20/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
I purchased the malem bedwetting alarm from the (b)(6).(b)(6).Within just a week of using it the alarm overheated and burnt my son's neck.When i mean burnt i mean burnt, not just some kind of redness.The alarm overheated and the plastic on the back of the alarm had melted and this melted plastic ate through my son's skin on his neck.We rushed him to the emergency room where he was there for one night.Who is going to pay my bills and who will compensate my son for his pain.Any answers.I noticed a bunch of complaints on maude, then why is this company still selling their alarms in the us.The malem alarms are like hot pots sitting in households, when they can get hot and burn a child is just a matter of time.Take action soon before another child gets burnt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM
Type of Device
MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BEDWETTING STORE
MDR Report Key6685799
MDR Text Key79140693
Report NumberMW5070778
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/30/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-