• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Fatigue (1849); Pain (1994); Tinnitus (2103); Constipation (3274)
Event Date 05/29/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This case was initially received via regulatory authority (b)(6) (reference number: (b)(4)) on 30-jun-2017.The most recent information was received on 17-aug-2017.This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of pelvic pain ("pelvic pains") in a (b)(6) year-old female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.The patient's past medical history included ankle fracture in 2009.Concomitant products included anesthetics and general (general anesthesia) on (b)(6) 2017 for anaesthesia.In (b)(6) 2008, the patient had essure inserted.On (b)(6) 2009, the patient experienced pelvic pain (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), hormone level abnormal ("hormonal disorders"), depression, back pain ("back pain"), vertigo ("vertigo"), migraine, myalgia ("muscular pain"), palpitations ("cardiac palpitation"), endometrial thickening ("very thick endometrium"), allergy to metals ("nickel allergy/cobalt allergy"), insomnia and hyperhidrosis ("sweatiness").On an unknown date, the patient experienced ear pruritus ("itching inside ear"), tinnitus, constipation ("constipation"), fatigue ("overwhelming fatigue (only fatigue related to recent anaesthesia)") and arthralgia ("joint pain especailly on fractured ankle").The patient was treated with surgery (essure removal via bilateral salpingectomy).Essure was removed on (b)(6) 2017.In 2017, the ear pruritus, tinnitus, constipation and arthralgia had resolved.At the time of the report, the pelvic pain, hormone level abnormal, depression, back pain, vertigo, migraine, myalgia, palpitations, endometrial thickening, allergy to metals, insomnia and hyperhidrosis outcome was unknown and the fatigue had resolved.The reporter provided no causality assessment for allergy to metals, arthralgia, back pain, constipation, depression, ear pruritus, endometrial thickening, fatigue, hormone level abnormal, hyperhidrosis, insomnia, migraine, myalgia, palpitations, pelvic pain, tinnitus and vertigo with essure.The reporter commented: since removal, no more constipation, transit returned to normal.No more itching inside ear and no more tinnitus.No more overwhelming fatigue (only fatigue related to recent anaesthesia), no more joint pain (especially in fractured ankle in 2009).The list of device similar incidents contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus coded with the same meddra preferred terms.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on 18-aug-2017 for the following meddra preferred term: pelvic pain: the analysis in the global safety database revealed 3518 cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Further company follow-up with the unknown is not possible.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 17-aug-2017: new events were reported: hormone level abnormal, depression, back pain, vertigo, migraine, myalgia, pelvic pains, palpitations, endometrial thickening, allergy to metals, insomnia and hyperhidrosis were reported.Event essure removal via bilateral salpingectomy was deleted, as it was considered that pelvic pains is the indication for procedure.Insertion date of essure was also provided.Incident: no lot number or sample available for investigation.There is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
This case was initially received via regulatory authority ansm (reference number: (b)(4)) on (b)(6) 2017.This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of salpingectomy ("essure removal via bilateral salpingectomy") in a (b)(6) female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.The patient's past medical history included ankle fracture in (b)(6) 2009.Concomitant products included anesthetics and general (general anesthesia) on (b)(6) 2017 for anaesthesia.On an unknown date, the patient had essure inserted.On (b)(6) 2017, the patient underwent salpingectomy (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required).On an unknown date, the patient experienced ear pruritus ("itching inside ear"), tinnitus ("tinnitus"), constipation ("constipation"), fatigue ("overwhelming fatigue (only fatigue related to recent anaesthesia)") and arthralgia ("joint pain especailly on fractured ankle").The patient was treated with surgery.In 2017, the ear pruritus, tinnitus, constipation and arthralgia had resolved.At the time of the report, the salpingectomy outcome was unknown and the fatigue had resolved.The reporter provided no causality assessment for arthralgia, constipation, ear pruritus, fatigue, salpingectomy and tinnitus with essure.The reporter commented: since removal, no more constipation, transit returned to normal.No more itching inside ear and no more tinnitus.No more overwhelming fatigue (only fatigue related to recent anaesthesia), no more joint pain (especially in fractured ankle in (b)(6) 2009) the list of device similar events contains essure reports received by bayer and older cases received by conceptus coded with the same medra preferred term.In this particular case a search in the database was performed on (b)(6) 2017 for the following meddra preferred term: salpingectomy.The analysis in the global safety database revealed (b)(4) cases.Bayer is closely monitoring the benefit-risk profile of essure.A recent cumulative review of all available data on essure has not yielded any new safety signal with regard to this meddra pt.Further company follow-up with the unknown is not possible.Company causality comment: no lot number or sample available for investigation.There is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k. shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd, p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key6689779
MDR Text Key133128197
Report Number2951250-2017-02434
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,foreign,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/05/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/30/2017
Initial Date FDA Received07/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/17/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/05/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age44 YR
-
-