• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 995
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Aortic Insufficiency (1715); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Arrhythmia (1721); Infarction, Cerebral (1771); Endocarditis (1834); Unspecified Infection (1930); Renal Failure (2041); Ventilator Dependent (2395); Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 12/10/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: jiro esaki, md, phd.Clinical outcomes of the david v valve-sparing root replacement compared with bioprosthetic valve-con duits for aortic root aneurysms.Ann thorac surg, publish date 2017; volume 103(6): pages 1824-1832: doi 10.1016/j.Athoracsur.2016.09.055 the earliest date of publication was used for the event date for this literature article.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding clinical outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement (vsrr) compared with those of conventional root replacement with the use of a bioprosthetic valve-conduits for aortic root aneurysms.This study compared the operative and midterm results.All data was collected from a single center between the years of 2002 to 2015.The study included 707 patients, predominantly male with a mean age of 53 years old.A total of 425 patient were implanted with a bioprosthetic valve-conduit of multiple manufacturers.A total of 111 of the 425 patients were implanted with a medtronic freestyle or mosaic device, serial numbers were not provided.Among all patients adverse events included: bleeding, prolonged ventilator, intra-aortic balloon pump placement, renal failure, transient ischemic attack (tia), stroke, permanent pacemaker implant, and deep sternal infection.Based on the available information, these events may have been attributed to a medtronic product.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6712739
MDR Text Key80008617
Report Number2025587-2017-01173
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/13/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number995
Device Catalogue Number995
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
-
-