SYNTHES MEZZOVICO 4.5MM VA-LCP CURVED CONDYLAR PLATE/8 HOLE/195MM/RIGHT; IMPLANT,FIXATION DEVICE, CONDYLAR PLATE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 02.124.408 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); Non-union Bone Fracture (2369)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional product code: hwc implant date reported as (b)(6) 2016.Concomitant devices reported: unknown 5.0mm locking stardrive screw (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 10).Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: part # 02.124.408; lot # 9312808, manufacturing site: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 14.Jan.2015.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The plate was reported as broken and required revision surgery.Upon receipt of the device it was found the plate was cracked.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a hardware removal and revision was performed on (b)(6) 2017 due to a broken 8-hole distal femur plate and femur non-union.The original procedure was performed in (b)(6) 2016.Subsequently, it was discovered that the plate had broken in two places.The removed hardware included: one (1) 4.5mm variable-angle (va)-locking compression plate (lcp) curved condylar plate/8 hole/195mm/right (which had broken in two places), and ten (10) 5.0mm locking stardrive screws (all intact).The breaks on the plate occurred at the sixth distal anterior hole and the seventh distal combi hole on the va posterior locking side.The patient was revised to a femoral nail.There were no reported surgical delays, no fragments involved and no additional x-rays required.The procedure was completed successfully with the patient in stable condition.This complaint involves one (1) device.Concomitant devices reported: unknown 5.0mm locking stardrive screw (part # unknown, lot # unknown, quantity # 10).This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Product code: jdp.Additional product codes: hrs, hwc.Initial date received by manufacturer: jun 19, 2017.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A product evaluation was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles indicates that the: customer quality (cq) engineering investigation: this complaint is confirmed.However, it was reported that the plate broke in two places, whereas the returned plate is cracked in two places.The plate is still in one piece (no fragments generated).Whether this complaint can be replicated at customer quality (cq) is not applicable for this complaint condition as the returned device cracked postoperatively.No new malfunctions were identified as a result of the investigation.The returned device is part of the 4.5mm va-lcp curved condylar plate system and is indicated for buttressing multi fragment distal femur fractures.A visual inspection under 5x magnification, device history record (dhr) review, complaint history review, drawing review, and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.Visual inspection at cq: however, it was reported that the plate broke in two places, whereas the returned plate is cracked in two places.The plate is still in one piece (no fragments generated).No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: subject device was received, changed code (b)(4).Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|