Catalog Number EX060801C |
Device Problems
Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Retraction Problem (1536); Misfire (2532)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 06/27/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No medical records have been made available to the manufacturer.Photos have been provided for evaluation.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that while the health care provider (hcp) was implanting a vascular stent in the common femoral artery, the stent allegedly became stuck.The hcp then noted that part of the stent was cut off and remained inside the patient while the other half remained in the sheath.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was performed.The lot records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.The review shows that no remarkable incidents occurred during the manufacturing process.No relevant manufacturing process changes were implemented, that could have led to the event reported.No additional complaint has been previously reported for this lot number.Investigation summary: two fractured segment of a self expandable bare metal stent were returned by the customer.In addition three photos on an x-ray screen were provided for evaluation.Based on the event information available and the condition of the stent returned, it is conclusive that the stent was partially deployed inside the patient and fractured during removal of the delivery system.This could be confirmed based on photos provided.As the delivery system was not returned for evaluation, the cause for the partial stent deployment could not be reproduced.Labeling review: in reviewing the labeling supplied with this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently describe the stent deployment procedure.The ifu states: "to ensure the most accurate placement, firmly hold the black system stability sheath throughout deployment.Do not hold the silver stent delivery sheath at any time during deployment.Do not constrict the stent delivery sheath during stent deployment.Initiate stent deployment by rotating the thumbwheel in the direction of the arrows, while holding the handle in a fixed position.If excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system as possible, and replace with a new unit.(.) deployment of the stent is complete when the proximal stent radiopaque markers appose the vessel wall and the sheath radiopaque zone is proximal to the proximal stent radiopaque markers." (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement procedure intended for the common femoral artery with access through the left superior femoral artery, the stent allegedly failed to completely deploy and became stuck in the sheath.Reportedly, it was observed that the stent had fractured and that half of the stent remained in the sheath and the other half remained inside the patient.Furthermore, there were difficulties removing the delivery system from the patient.No medical intervention was performed to remove the stent fragment and remained inside the patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|