Model Number 03.501.080 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/25/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Investigation is ongoing; no conclusion could be drawn as product is entering the complaint system.Device history records review was conducted.The report indicates that the: part #03.501.080/ lot #8572599, manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 10.Sep.2013.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes on an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the applicator didn´t function, so the surgeon needed to tighten the zipfix implant by hand.The sprint in the instrument didn´t work.There was a 10 minutes delay in surgery time and the patient outcome was reported as good.Surgery was successfully completed and no harm to the patient.This complaint involves one part.Concomitant parts reported: 1x zipfix implant, part unk, lot unk.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: patient date of birth reported as (b)(6).Patient gender not available for reporting.Device was forwarded to sustaining engineering for evaluation.As received condition: 2nd generation instrument design, with some expected visual evidence of longer use on the trigger component.No design related root cause has been identified on the returned instrument.The instrument functions as per the design intent.Therefore, the complaint is closed by sustaining engineering as invalid.Note: the potential root cause of the device failure based on the device condition as received could be related to the not performed lubrication during the clinical reprocessing.Corrected data: device code and common name.Country and postal code.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|