The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2017-01238.The hospital disposed of the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the hepatic artery using ruby coils and pod8's.During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed and detached initial penumbra coils into the target vessel using a non-penumbra microcatheter.While attempting to advance a new ruby coil through the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and subsequently, the ruby coil pusher assembly became bent.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed and it was observed that the microcatheter appeared to be bent.The physician then deployed and detached additional penumbra coils into the target vessel using the same microcatheter.While attempting to pull a new pod8 out of its packaging hoop, the physician inadvertently bent the pod8 pusher assembly.Therefore, the pod8 was set aside and the procedure was successfully completed using four ruby coils, two pod packing coils (podj's), one pod6 and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|