The check of the dhr of the lot # involved did not show any anomaly on the 75 smr resection jigs manufactured with the lot# 2014aa134, and also on the 601 pins manufactured with the lot# 2014aa103.We received the jig and 2 pins with lot# 2014aa103.They underwent a dimensional check which gave the following results: the diameter of the two pins (male diameter) are both compliant to specifications, even if very near to the maximum allowed; of the 7 total holes (female diameter) of the resection jig, 2 are slightly under-dimensioned (maximum deviation: -0.07mm).In addition, one of the returned pins is very damaged on the external surface, and this prevents a proper sliding of this damaged pin through all the holes of the resection jig (also the holes of the jig with diameter compliant to specification).Summarizing: the root cause of this intra-op issue is the strong damage on the external surface of one of 2 pins (probably due to its repeated and maybe incorrect use).The slight under-dimensioning of 2 holes of the resection jig contributed to the issue reported.This is confirmed by the fact that the non-damaged pin can pass through 6 holes of the jig.This pin cannot pass through the 7th hole only (the one which is more under-dimensioned, -0.07mm).No corrective action for this specific case.In may 2016, the technical drawing of the smr reverse resection jig was modified in order to slightly increase the holes diameter and reduce the risk of intra-op seizure of the pin into the holes.Pms data: limacorporate is aware of a total of 6 similar events with smr anatomic resection jigs model # 9013.50.304.For the cases where we received and could analyze the devices involved, the cause of the seizure between jig and pin was identified to be the damage on the external surface of the pin (male taper), maybe due to its improper use, combined with the dimensions of the pin diameter very near to the maximum allowed or slightly exceeding the maximum allowed (after damaging).In this specific case, also the under-dimensioning of one hole of the jig may have contributed to the issue.A total of about (b)(4) implants have been performed ww with these resection jigs since july 2014, giving an occurrence rate of (b)(4).The anatomic resection jigs involved in all the 6 cases reported were manufactured before the technical improvement on the holes diameter.No complaints have been reported on the improved anatomic resection jigs.Limacorporate will continue to monitor the market to promptly detect the possible recurrence of this issue and assess the effectiveness of the corrective action performed.
|