Catalog Number 4350XL |
Device Problem
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problems
Fever (1858); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 07/10/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.In addition, a review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted and the batch met all finished goods release criteria.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a laparoscopic colectomy on (b)(6)2017 and an absorbable adhesion barrier was used.The patient experienced accumulation of liquid and gas, fever and abdominal pain.The accumulation of liquid was confirmed by ct.The shape of the accumulation area was a rectangle, which was the same shape with the adhesion barrier.The patient experienced the fever on (b)(6)2017 and was provided oral antibiotics.Inflammation was relieved and the level of crp became decreased.The surgeon opined that it is unknown whether there was a causal relationship between the absorbable adhesion barrier and the reported event.Additional information has been requested.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information additional patient codes: (b)(4)- treatment with medication corrected device codes: (b)(4)- inflammation occurred additional information was requested and the following was obtained: [current stats of patient] the patient has already discharged from the hospital.- from (b)(6) 2017 (pod 4) to (b)(6), levofloxacin was applied to the patient.- on (b)(6) (pod 11) the patient was discharged from the hospital.- on (b)(6), the patient visited the hospital as an outpatient.It was observed that the caudal side on the umbilical area was hard.The patient had a slight pain there.No symptom of infection was seen.[treatment plan] the patient will be monitored.Diagnostic imaging is not scheduled.[surgeon¿s opinion about seriousness and reason] not serious (moderate/ minor) since surgical treatment is not necessary at this moment.[surgeon¿s comment] there is a possibility that the accumulation of liquid was caused by the interceed.Since there was no accumulation of liquid around the sutured area, the problem was not due to the surgeon¿s technique of suturing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|