• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number FR995
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Material Rupture (1546)
Patient Problem Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758)
Event Date 07/12/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis is in progress.Analysis results will be submitted in a supplemental report.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that 15 years post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve, the device was explanted and replaced due to a leaflet tear and calcification.No other adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, three excised leaflets and four loose tissue pieces were returned.All leaflets had been excised during explant.The orientation of leaflets was not known based on the receipt condition.All excised leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible except where pannus and/or calcification extended on the inflow and outflow aspects.Tissue deterioration due to visible calcification was observed on all three leaflets.Traces of glistening off white pannus observed to the margin of attachments of all excised leaflets.Pannus was observed on two of the loose tissue returned.Radiography revealed calcification in all three excised leaflets and on three of the loose tissue pieces.Conclusion: due to the receipt condition, the reported tear cannot be confirmed.Pannus overgrowth was observed.Also tissue deterioration due to calcification was observed on all three leaflets.Based on the received information and device analysis, the calcification could be the potential cause of the reported cuspal tear.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key6771113
MDR Text Key81948035
Report Number2025587-2017-01320
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00681490816465
UDI-Public00681490816465
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/15/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/03/2007
Device Model NumberFR995
Device Catalogue NumberFR995-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/14/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/12/2017
Initial Date FDA Received08/07/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/25/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2002
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
-
-