• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD4; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD4; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPOD4
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Retraction Problem (1536); Physical Resistance (2578)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/12/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pod4 pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The outer diameter (od) of the embolization coil was measured and found to be within specification.The introducer sheath was ovalized approximately 1.0 cm from the distal tip.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pod4s introducer sheath was ovalized.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the introducer sheath is forcefully gripped during insertion or while advancing the embolization coil into the microcatheter, damage such as this may occur.The od of the embolization coil was measured and found to be within specification.The root cause of the reported resistance during removal of the device could not be determined.The non-penumbra microcatheter mentioned in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat an abdominal bleed using pod4s.During the procedure, while attempting to place a pod4 as an anchoring coil, the physician did not mention resistance while advancing the coil through the non-penumbra microcatheter; however, the pod4 was unable to be deployed because the microcatheter was not well positioned so the physician decided to remove the pod4.While attempting to retract the pod4, the physician encountered resistance and felt that the pod4 had unintentionally detached.Therefore, the physician removed the microcatheter containing the pod4 from the patient.Next, the pod4 pusher assembly was pulled out of the microcatheter and it was observed that the coil came out intact.The microcatheter was then flushed and re-inserted into the patients body.Thereafter, the procedure was completed using a new penumbra coil 400 (pc400) and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k) was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #1 mfr report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD4
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key6795741
MDR Text Key82769352
Report Number3005168196-2017-01318
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013756
UDI-Public00814548013756
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K141134
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/17/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/15/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date03/30/2024
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD4
Device Lot NumberF68771
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/04/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-