Catalog Number SECX-10-7-40-135 |
Device Problem
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 07/14/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Physician used a protégé rx carotid stent system with a 6f sheath and non-medtronic embolic protection device for treatment of a 30mm severely calcified, moderately tortuous lesion the right distal- common carotid artery of diameter 8mm.Lesion exhibited 85% stenosis.Device prepped as per ifu without issue.Lesion was pre-dilated using a 5mm non-medtronic pre-dilation device.It was reported that the device did not pass through a previously deployed stent and there was no resistance encountered while advancing the device.It was reported that post-deployment, the stent tip broke off when pulling the delivery catheter back through the ¿touey¿.The component embolized within the delivery catheter.¿touey¿ and the sheath were removed thereby removing the tip component from the patient.Stent was deployed successfully so the case was completed.No patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The protégé rx device was returned.Within the box the device was returned with ancillary device: y-connector which was not part of the protégé rx delivery system.Three images were returned for evaluation.Per the images, the protégé rx was positioned at the target lesion and the stent was deployed successfully at the targeted lesion.The tuohy borst was observed loose and was able to be tightened.Visual inspection of the delivery catheter revealed the tip broke approximately 20mm proximally to marker band of the inner lumen.The stent was not returned as it was successfully implanted.The overall length of the catheter was measured at approximately 139cm.The measure working length of the catheter is outside of product specification of 135cm.This is an indication that the catheter was stretched during withdrawal.A known good protégé rx device with distal tip was compared to the defective returned protégé rx which revealed the tip was broken.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|