A patient arrived at the emergency room with symptoms of hyperglycemia after obtaining a higher than expected glucose reading on her home meter (type unknown).The customer then obtained questionable low glucose results for the patient using the gluc3 glucose hk gen.3 on the cobas 6000 c (501) module (c501, serial number (b)(4)).The initial results were released outside the laboratory.No data flags or alarms occurred.All results are in units of mg/dl.At 7:23 am, a venous sample result was 106 on the c501; sample was repeated at an unknown time with a result of 107.At 10:22 am, a venous sample result was 144 on the c501.At 5:00 pm, a fingerstick sample result was 499 from a professional glucose meter (type not provided).At 6:20 pm, a fingerstick sample result was 405 from the professional glucose meter.At 6:28 pm, a fingerstick sample result was 355 from the professional glucose meter.At 6:29 pm, a venous sample result was 88 on the c501.The customer did not believe the results from the c501.The patient was treated for hyperglycemia based upon the meter results.The customer recalibrated the assay after the event and ran quality controls (qc) which were acceptable.The customer repeated the venous sample from 6:29 pm on the original c501 and another c501.The results were 89 and 91 respectively.No adverse event occurred.The patient ingested 50 grams of vitamin c at some point prior to the sample draws.The customer suspected possible interference.Calibration and qc were acceptable prior to the event.The field service representative did not find a cause for the issue.He adjusted the gear pump pressure and flushed two valves.He checked dispense levels.The customer ran a precision check which was acceptable.Samples were requested for investigation.Investigation activities are ongoing.
|