(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: a visual inspection was performed on the returned device which identified a hypotube separation.The reported kink was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents reported from this lot.The investigation determined the reported/noted difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|