• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MALEM MEDICAL UK MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MALEM MEDICAL UK MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM Back to Search Results
Model Number NONE
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 09/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
My son was using the malem ultimate bedwetting alarm which i bought from the (b)(6) store (link: (b)(6)), the alarm got hot and burnt my son on his neck and shoulder.This problem occurred on the very first day of using the alarm, which makes it nothing but a manufacturing defect with the product.Unfortunately, since this incident occurred in the middle of the night, my family physician was not available then.So we applied ice water to his burns several times a night and took him to the doctor first thing in the morning.I tell you, the pain was excruciating and my son had to bear it all.There is a problem with the product and i request the fda to look into this at the earliest.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM
Type of Device
MALEM BEDWETTING ALARM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MALEM MEDICAL UK
MDR Report Key6851350
MDR Text Key85593149
Report NumberMW5072021
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/06/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/08/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Device Model NumberNONE
Device Lot NumberNONE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age33 YR
-
-