It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, metallosis, synovitis, osteolysis, and elevated metal ion levels.
|
It was reported that left hip revision surgery was performed due to pain, metallosis, synovitis, osteolysis, and elevated metal ion levels.During the revision the hemi head and modular sleeve were removed.The synergy stem and bhr cup remain implanted.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the known devices reportedly involved in this incident.Review of manufacturing records did not reveal any waivers, concessions, manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have contributed to this issue.The available medical documents were reviewed.This case reports five year post implantation of a ltha this patient underwent a bhr revision to exchange the head to a mdm head due to pain, metallosis, synovitis, osteolysis, and elevated metal ion levels.The only clinical documents provided were the primary and revision operative reports.Intra-operative revision findings; there was a little synovial proliferation coming out soft tissues.About 10cc of turbulent greenish fluid was removed for culture and pathology.The posterior soft tissue envelope was elevated.The inside synovium was dissected out.There was significant synovitis approximately three and five mm thick throughout the joint.After the posterior synovium was cleaned, the surgeon performed a medial capsular release dislocated the head, and removed it.There was major trunnionosis, blackish staining of the trunnion and the sleeve.The trunnion was cleaned with sand paper per the revision.The trunnion and the femur were cleansed of all synovial tissue.There was a large osteolytic lesion on the posterior aspect of the femur that extended about eight cm distal on the femur.The stem itself was well fixed.Once the acetabulum was exposed an anterior and lateral synectomy was performed.There was some blackish staining right in the interface.After the surgeon finished cleaning he felt there was no significant osteolysis around the interface area.The clinical information provided is consistent with reactions from metal debris.However, the source cannot be confirmed.Additionally, neither the pathology reports, the explanted device, nor the metal ion levels provided for inclusion in this investigation.Therefore, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions are associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The impact to the patient beyond the revision cannot be concluded.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
|