Catalog Number 08.501.001.20S |
Device Problem
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/21/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient identifier is not available for reporting.Udi (b)(4).Hospital address and telephone not available for reporting.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Dhr review was completed.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Supplier: external supplier (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 07.Feb.2017 expiry date: 01.Jan.2022.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported patient was implanted with two (2) sternal zipfix implants on (b)(6) 2017.A few hours later patient was returned to surgery due to a bleeding complication.During the second surgery it was noted that one (1) of the zipfix implants was loose.The zipfix was removed and replaced with cerclage.Surgeon noted the bleeding complication was probably not due to the zipfix implanted earlier.Concomitant devices reported: sternal zipfix with needle (08.501.001.20s, lot l117503, quantity 1) this report is for one (1) sternal zipfix with needle.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event/surgery date, implant date, and explant date updated.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in sweden as follows: it was reported patient was implanted with two (2) sternal zipfix implants on (b)(6) 2017.A few hours later patient was returned to surgery due to a bleeding complication.During the second surgery it was noted that one (1) of the zipfix implants was loose.The zipfix was removed and replaced with cerclage.Surgeon noted the bleeding complication was probably not due to the zipfix implanted earlier.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Hospital telephone: (b)(6).Returned devices were forwarded to the manufacturing site for investigation.Two sternal zipfix devices were returned.While the first one had been returned in broken state and represents the actual complaint the second one was tightened by the hospital to check if the complaint could be replicated.The hospital claimed no issue with the second device.Sustaining engineering did not identify any design related root cause which would explain the one device failure as seen in this complaint.Improper alignment during insertion of the toothed end into locking head has led to unilateral deformation in the locking head which in turn caused the stripping of the device.A design related root cause is excluded.This non-manufacturing investigation is closed by sustaining engineering as in-valid.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|