• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 52MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 52MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74120152
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Tissue Damage (2104); Toxicity (2333); Injury (2348); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 12/13/2013
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to soft tissue damage and elevated levels of metal ions.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed due to soft tissue damage and elevated levels of metal ions.During surgery bhr cup and bhr head were removed.As of today, device return and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.Since no device part and lot details were received for investigation, no thorough manufacturing record review of the devices involved in the reported event can be performed.The available medical documents were reviewed.Review of the provided implantation report indicated no inconsistencies related to the surgical technique, a potential cause or contributing factor for the later revision.According to the provided revision report, the patient had elevated blood metal ions, well-positioned components and an mri showed moderate evidence of soft tissue reaction.During the revision, there was minimal gray synovial proliferation and no abnormal soft tissue reaction and clear yellow fluid in the acetabulum.Based on the provided documents a root cause for the reported findings cannot be determined.A contribution from the contralateral bhr resurfacing to the blood metal ions cannot be excluded.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the bhr cup and head were removed.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information have been requested for this complaint but have not become available.A review of the complaint history for the bhr cup and head was performed using batch numbers in search of similar recurring reports for the products during their lifetimes.No other similar complaints were identified.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All the released devices involved met manufacturing specifications at the time of production.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.Review of the provided implantation report indicated no inconsistencies related to the surgical technique, a potential cause or contributing factor for the later revision.According to the provided revision report, the patient had elevated blood metal ions, well-positioned components and an mri showed moderate evidence of soft tissue reaction.During the revision, there was minimal gray synovial proliferation and no abnormal soft tissue reaction and clear yellow fluid in the acetabulum.Based on the provided documents a root cause for the reported findings cannot be determined.A contribution from the contralateral bhr resurfacing to the blood metal ions cannot be excluded.Further, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the details supplied in this complaint, and our investigation remains inconclusive.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.No preventative or corrective action has been initiated as a result of this investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETLR CUP HAP 52MM W/ IMPTR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house
spa park
leamington spa CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
markus poettker
schachenallee 29
aarau 5001
SZ   5001
MDR Report Key6875099
MDR Text Key86558281
Report Number3005975929-2017-00289
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/24/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2013
Device Catalogue Number74120152
Device Lot Number094561
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2017
Initial Date FDA Received09/19/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/12/2017
09/12/2017
09/12/2017
12/23/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/01/2017
07/24/2018
02/21/2020
12/24/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FEMORAL HEAD, PART AND LOT # UNKNOWN.; FEMORAL HEAD, PART AND LOT # UNKNOWN
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-