The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.The lot number was not provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records could not be completed.
|
It was reported that the tip of the swan ganz catheter was found to be torn during balloon inflation testing, prior to use.Additionally, it was noted that fragments of the damaged balloon had separated.Patient demographic information requested but unavailable.There was no allegation of patient injury.
|
Our product evaluation laboratory received one swan-ganz catheter with a monoject limited volume syringe and contamination shield.As received, the contamination shield was detached from the proximal tuohy borst connector.The balloon inflated clear and concentric and remained inflated for 5 minutes without leakage.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.No visible damage was observed from catheter body or returned syringe.The report of a balloon issue was not confirmed, as the device responded appropriately during functional testing.There was no evidence of a manufacturing nonconformance.No actions will be taken at this time.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.It is common clinical practice to check balloon integrity by inflating it to the recommended volume in order to detect any asymmetry or leakage condition before use of the catheter.When there is separation of the balloon or fragments from the pulmonary artery catheter, the retained fragments will embolize to the lungs.Due to the large surface area of the pulmonary vasculature, this is generally well tolerated.It is unknown if user or procedural factors contributed to this event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|