• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TGU313115J
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/12/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis included in this report: tgu404015j/16359483 udi¿s: (b)(4).A review of the manufacturing records for the devices verified that the lots met all pre-release specifications.Per the conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis instructions for use (ifu), complications associated with the use of the gore® tag® thoracic endoprosthesis may include, but are not limited to endoleak and reoperation.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017, the patient was implanted with two conformable gore® tag® thoracic endoprostheses to treat an aortic arch aneurysm.Bypass to the left common carotid artery (lcca) and the left subclavian artery (lsa) was performed prior to the procedure.A 31mm x 15cm gore® tag® device (tgu313115j/ 16359468) was deployed distally in the descending aorta, and a 40mm x 15cm gore® tag® device (tgu404015j/ 16359483) was then deployed just distal to the brachiocephalic artery as planned.The lcca and the lsa were covered by tgu404015j.According to the report, touch-up ballooning was performed only to the junction of the two endoprostheses.Final-angiography reportedly showed no endoleak, and the procedure was concluded.The patient tolerated the procedure.On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2017, follow-up imaging reportedly confirmed an unknown type of endoleak.On (b)(6) 2017, the physician opted to perform a re-intervention procedure.Intra-procedural angiography reportedly could not confirm any endoleak at that time.Touch-up ballooning was performed to the proximal end, and at the junction of the endoprostheses.The origin of the lsa was also coil embolized as a precautionary measure.Final angiography showed no evidence of endoleak, and the procedure was concluded.The patient tolerated the procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® TAG® THORACIC ENDOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL WOODY SPRINGS B/P
3450 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
damon jackson
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key6892216
MDR Text Key87293192
Report Number2017233-2017-00497
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P040043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/12/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/01/2020
Device Catalogue NumberTGU313115J
Device Lot Number16359468
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/02/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
-
-