• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: K2M, INC., DENALI SPINAL SYSTEM; PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

K2M, INC., DENALI SPINAL SYSTEM; PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 101-N55300
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Information (3190)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A comprehensive investigation was immediately initiated on receipt of the complaint.The subject product was not returned for evaluation but evaluation is still in progress.Upon completion of evaluation of the subject part, k2m inc.Will file a supplemental report indicating the findings.
 
Event Description
On (b)(4) 2017 it was reported to k2m, inc.That a patient presented with a rod break approximately 9 months post-operatively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A comprehensive investigation was immediately initiated on receipt of the complaint.The product was not returned to manufacturer for evaluation, and a thorough investigation could not be completed as the lot number has not been identified/confirmed in this case.Since the rod remains in the patient, no physical, chemical evaluation could be performed, and the root cause of the reported issue could not be ascertained.The surgical history indicated progression and adjacent level degeneration.Review of the fluoro imagery resulted in an observation of rod fracture between the l2-l3 levels with the break occurring through the rod bend which is located at the cephalad end of the lower construct.Pseudarthrosis or progressive degeneration could contribute to over load or fatigue to an existing rod construct.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017 it was reported to k2m, inc.That a patient presented with a rod break approximately 9 months post-op.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A comprehensive investigation was immediately initiated on receipt of the complaint.The product was returned to manufacturer for evaluation, and a thorough investigation could not be completed as the lot number has not been identified/confirmed in this case.The surgical history indicated progression and adjacent level degeneration.Review of the fluoro imagery resulted in an observation of rod fracture between the l2-l3 levels with the break occurring through the rod bend which is located at the cephalad end of the lower construct.Pseudarthrosis or progressive degeneration could contribute to over load or fatigue to an existing rod construct.Further investigation upon return of the subject device confirmed metal fatigue leading to rod fracture.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2017 it was reported to k2m, inc.That a patient presented with a rod break approximately 9 months post-op.On (b)(6) 2018 it was reported that the patient was revised.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DENALI SPINAL SYSTEM
Type of Device
PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
K2M, INC.,
600 hope parkway se
leesburg VA 20175
Manufacturer (Section G)
K2M, INC.,
600 hope parkway se
leesburg VA 20175
Manufacturer Contact
sandra gilbert
600 hope parkway se
leesburg, VA 20175
5719192195
MDR Report Key6896939
MDR Text Key88863072
Report Number3004774118-2017-00134
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K070229
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2017
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue Number101-N55300
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/01/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/30/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
-
-