• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number EX062003JL
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Misfire (2532)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 09/07/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
No medical records or no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the device is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a stent placement in a chronic total occlusion target lesion with severe calcification around the right superior femoral artery to the popliteal artery, the guidewire was allegedly difficult to insert in the delivery system.Reportedly, after the lesion was predilated, the delivery system was allegedly unable to advance through the proximal end of the target lesion due to severe calcification.It was further reported, that during the stent deployment attempt at the site, the delivery system could not advance any further.The health care provider felt resistance and only four centimeters of the stent was deployed and the stent could not deploy any further.After a failed attempt to completely deploy the stent using forceps, the health care provider elected to remove the device.During removal of the device, four centimeters of the stent allegedly detached from the device and remained inside the vessel.A competitor's device was deployed to address the detached part of the stent and another stent was deployed into the distal end of the target lesion.Patient's anatomy has recovered.Current patient status is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was performed.Based on the lot history review, the used product complied with all manufacturing specifications leading to final device release.In reviewing manufacturing and quality records, no relevant manufacturing process changes were implemented that could have led to the event reported.No manufacturing anomalies or deviations, which may have caused or contributed to the event reported, have been identified.No additional complaint has been previously reported for this lot number.Investigation summary: based on the investigation of the returned catheter sample it was confirmed that the delivery system could only partially deploy the stent and that stent fracture occurred upon removal of the partially released delivery system/stent from the patient.It was also confirmed that the user tried to manually release the stent by dismantling the grip and pulling on inner components.A force transmitting joint was found broken which led to the conclusion that a high release force must have been present during stent release which led to partial stent deployment and stent fracture upon removal from the patient.The system was found over triggered as a consequence of the deployment failure which led to further damage.However, based on the information available and the evaluation of the sample returned, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: in reviewing the labeling supplied with this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.The ifu states: 'do not constrict the delivery system during stent deployment.(.) if excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system and replace with a new unit.', and 'if resistance is met during stent system introduction, the stent system should be withdrawn and another stent system should be used.' in regards to over triggering the ifu states: 'do not push the trigger after the stent is fully deployed.', however, in this case a deployment failure occurred.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a stent placement in a chronic total occlusion target lesion with severe calcification around the right superior femoral artery to the popliteal artery, the guidewire was allegedly difficult to insert in the patient due to severe calcifications.Reportedly, after the lesion was predilated, the delivery system was allegedly unable to advance through the proximal end of the target lesion due to severe calcification.The health care provider felt resistance and only four centimeters of the stent was deployed and the stent could not deploy any further.After a failed attempt to completely deploy the stent using forceps, the health care provider elected to remove the device.During removal of the device, four centimeters of the stent allegedly detached from the device and remained inside the vessel.A competitor's device was deployed to address the detached part of the stent and another stent was deployed into the distal end of the target lesion.Patient's anatomy has recovered.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFESTENT SOLO VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
VASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstrasse 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
judith ludwig
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key6921296
MDR Text Key89022975
Report Number9681442-2017-00279
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier00801741112058
UDI-Public(01)00801741112058
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P070014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/24/2019
Device Catalogue NumberEX062003JL
Device Lot NumberANBQ3511
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/08/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/06/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/21/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/10/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/11/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age80 YR
-
-