Catalog Number EX062003JL |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Misfire (2532)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 09/07/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No medical records or no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the device is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement in a chronic total occlusion target lesion with severe calcification around the right superior femoral artery to the popliteal artery, the guidewire was allegedly difficult to insert in the delivery system.Reportedly, after the lesion was predilated, the delivery system was allegedly unable to advance through the proximal end of the target lesion due to severe calcification.It was further reported, that during the stent deployment attempt at the site, the delivery system could not advance any further.The health care provider felt resistance and only four centimeters of the stent was deployed and the stent could not deploy any further.After a failed attempt to completely deploy the stent using forceps, the health care provider elected to remove the device.During removal of the device, four centimeters of the stent allegedly detached from the device and remained inside the vessel.A competitor's device was deployed to address the detached part of the stent and another stent was deployed into the distal end of the target lesion.Patient's anatomy has recovered.Current patient status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was performed.Based on the lot history review, the used product complied with all manufacturing specifications leading to final device release.In reviewing manufacturing and quality records, no relevant manufacturing process changes were implemented that could have led to the event reported.No manufacturing anomalies or deviations, which may have caused or contributed to the event reported, have been identified.No additional complaint has been previously reported for this lot number.Investigation summary: based on the investigation of the returned catheter sample it was confirmed that the delivery system could only partially deploy the stent and that stent fracture occurred upon removal of the partially released delivery system/stent from the patient.It was also confirmed that the user tried to manually release the stent by dismantling the grip and pulling on inner components.A force transmitting joint was found broken which led to the conclusion that a high release force must have been present during stent release which led to partial stent deployment and stent fracture upon removal from the patient.The system was found over triggered as a consequence of the deployment failure which led to further damage.However, based on the information available and the evaluation of the sample returned, a definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: in reviewing the labeling supplied with this product it was found that the instructions for use (ifu) sufficiently address the potential risks.The ifu states: 'do not constrict the delivery system during stent deployment.(.) if excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the stent system.Remove the stent system and replace with a new unit.', and 'if resistance is met during stent system introduction, the stent system should be withdrawn and another stent system should be used.' in regards to over triggering the ifu states: 'do not push the trigger after the stent is fully deployed.', however, in this case a deployment failure occurred.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a stent placement in a chronic total occlusion target lesion with severe calcification around the right superior femoral artery to the popliteal artery, the guidewire was allegedly difficult to insert in the patient due to severe calcifications.Reportedly, after the lesion was predilated, the delivery system was allegedly unable to advance through the proximal end of the target lesion due to severe calcification.The health care provider felt resistance and only four centimeters of the stent was deployed and the stent could not deploy any further.After a failed attempt to completely deploy the stent using forceps, the health care provider elected to remove the device.During removal of the device, four centimeters of the stent allegedly detached from the device and remained inside the vessel.A competitor's device was deployed to address the detached part of the stent and another stent was deployed into the distal end of the target lesion.Patient's anatomy has recovered.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|