• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 2; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 2; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180612
Device Problem Packaging Problem (3007)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/15/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history records indicates the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
After implanting the components, we were reviewing the usage form and saw that the implant box said tibial baseplate size 2rm/ll and the implant sticker said, "7rm/ll".The implant was the correct size and we were able to finish without any issues.Pka procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding label mix involving a mako baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed.Device evaluation and results: the implant box and the implant sticker (patient label) were returned intact.The outer label of the implant box does not match the label of the implant sticker.Medical records received and evaluation: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.Device history review: review indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced conclusions: visual inspection of the returned implant box and the implant sticker confirmed that the outer label of the implant box does not match the label of the implant sticker.Nc has been raised to investigate the event.It was identified that the most likely root cause was due to improper line clearance during the printing process.
 
Event Description
After implanting the components, we were reviewing the usage form and saw that the implant box said tibial baseplate size 2rm/ll and the implant sticker said, "7rm/ll".The implant was the correct size and we were able to finish without any issues.Pka procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK TIBIAL BASEPLATE-RM/LL-SZ 2
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
Manufacturer Contact
brian lauro
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6949853
MDR Text Key90181055
Report Number0002249697-2017-03013
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
UDI-Device Identifier00848486000752
UDI-Public00848486000752
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/30/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/30/2022
Device Catalogue Number180612
Device Lot Number26080317-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2017
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/15/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/01/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/30/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/30/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-