|
Catalog Number 06437281190 |
Device Problem
High Test Results (2457)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 09/27/2017 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This event occurred in (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer stated that they received erroneous high results for ten patient samples tested for the elecsys ft4 ii assay (ft4) on a cobas 8000 e 602 module (e602).The high values were noticed after the reagent pack had been changed.It was asked, but it is not known if an erroneous result was reported outside of the laboratory.The customer checked calibration and found that the calibration did not pass.The customer changed the calibrator, but there was no change.The customer then changed the reagent pack and the issue was no longer observed.The affected samples were repeated after changing the reagent pack.The first sample initially resulted as 1.69 ng/dl and repeated as 1.13 ng/dl.The second sample initially resulted as 1.85 ng/dl and repeated as 1.23 ng/dl.The third sample initially resulted as 1.97 ng/dl and repeated as 1.32 ng/dl.The fourth sample initially resulted as 1.36 ng/dl and repeated as 0.91 ng/dl.The fifth sample initially resulted as 1.98 ng/dl and repeated as 1.33 ng/dl.The sixth sample initially resulted as 2.15 ng/dl and repeated as 1.40 ng/dl.The seventh sample initially resulted as 2.70 ng/dl and repeated as 1.80 ng/dl.The eighth sample initially resulted as 2.50 ng/dl and repeated as 1.67 ng/dl.The ninth sample initially resulted as 1.49 ng/dl and repeated as 1.04 ng/dl.The tenth sample initially resulted as 1.81 ng/dl and repeated as 1.26 ng/dl.No adverse events were alleged to have occurred with the patients.The e602 analyzer serial number was asked for, but not provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The calibration signals generated with the complained reagent pack were lower than expected ranges.The pack was provided for investigation where calibration and control measurements of the pack were compared to results from a retention reagent pack.From this investigation, it was concluded that there was no issue with the performance of the complained reagent pack.A specific root cause could not be determined based on the provided information.Additional information required for the investigation was requested, but not provided.Given the low calibration signals measured by the customer, it is possible that either the calibrator material was deteriorated or the reagent pack was not yet fully at room temperature when performing the calibrations and initial measurements at the customer site.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|