Model Number 9-VSD-MUSC-016 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Hemolysis (1886)
|
Event Date 08/25/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Our investigation was limited to the review of the device history record, which showed that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and indicated complete in accordance with abbott specifications and procedures.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
|
|
Event Description
|
A 12/10mm amplatzer duct occluder was selected for implant for the closure of a ventricular septal defect (vsd) but was too small and removed without being released from the delivery cable.Next, a 14mm amplatzer muscular vsd occluder (muscvsd) was selected for use, however it was too small.Finally, a 16mm muscvsd was successfully implanted.The patient developed hemolysis due to the high pressure flow across the muscvsd device and required surgical removal of the device and surgical closure of the vsd.In the opinion of the user, hemolysis is sometimes seen with device closure of vsds and is not considered a malfunction of the muscvsd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event of "hemolysis due to the high pressure flow across the muscvsd device" was reported.Visual examination revealed no anomalies were present.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed.The cause of the reported event remains unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2017, a 12/10mm amplatzer duct occluder was selected for implant for the closure of a ventricular septal defect (vsd) but was too small and removed without being released from the delivery cable.Next, a 14mm amplatzer muscular vsd occluder (muscvsd) was selected for use, however it was too small.Finally, a 16mm muscvsd was successfully implanted.It was noted the next day that the patient had developed hemolysis due to the high pressure flow across the muscvsd device.The muscvsd was surgically removed and the vsd was closed on (b)(6) 2017.The patient had a follow-up appointment on (b)(6) 2017 and was doing well with no sequelae related to the device closure or removal.In the opinion of the user, hemolysis is sometimes seen with device closure of vsds and is not considered a malfunction of the muscvsd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|