On (b)(6) 2017 during an avr on an obese patient who had a high creatinine level, the physician chose a perceval valve to implant as due to the higher risk nature of the case a reduction in the operative time was preferred.The physician noted that the aortic annulus was quite "wonky" and he initially thought that it was bicuspid but believe now that it was possibly quadricuspid.The valve was sized, collapsed and deployed in the usual manner.Under inspection the physician was not pleased with the seating of the valve and the way it looked in the annulus.He determined that due to the unusual nature of this patient's annulus, the best solution was to remove the perceval valve and put in a conventional sutured aortic prosthesis.As per the physician no further complications with the patient or surgery other than the added time it took to remove the perceval and suture in another valve, which was greater than 20 minutes addition to the x clamp time.
|