• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number G38482
Device Problem Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/27/2017
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Information pertaining to contact officeas follows: importer site contact and address: (b)(4).Importer site establishment registration number: (b)(4).Pma/510(k) #p100022/s014.¿the stent went in okay and when deploying the stent on the thumbwheel, the mechanism in the device broke.The thumbwheel would spin without any action on the stent.The physician treated it as a pin and pull and was able to deploy the device successfully.¿ the device was returned and received 20-oct-17.With the information currently available, a document based investigation was conducted.The investigation will be updated once the device has been evaluated.From customer testimony, it is known that the complaint device was advanced over a roadrunner wire guide, of 0.014¿ diameter which was switched for a quartus emerald wire.The complaint device was flushed prior to use.The stent was eventually deployed.The target lesion was severely calcified.Pre-dilation was conducted prior to stent deployment.There is no evidence to suggest that this incident did not occur.Complaint is confirmed based on the customer¿s testimony.Possible causes for this occurrence include the severely calcified lesion, or the use of an incorrect wire guide.The difficult anatomy could have created resistance during deployment, and the incorrect wire guide could have provided insufficient support during deployment, which could have caused or contributed to the failure to deploy the stent.However, as the complaint device has not yet been returned, and the conditions of use cannot be replicated in a laboratory environment, a definitive root cause for this occurrence cannot be determined.It can be noted that as per the product instructions for use: ¿a 0.035 inch (0.89mm) diameter wire guide should be used during tracking, deployment and removal in order to ensure adequate support of the system¿ prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.Upon review of complaints, this failure mode has not occurred previously with this lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with this lot number.It may be noted that the failure mode of "deployment difficult" has been provisionally assigned.The final failure mode will be confirmed following device return and evaluation.There is no evidence to suggest that this incident did not occur.Complaint is confirmed based on the customer¿s testimony.According to information provided, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.The risk will be assessed for this complaint once the device has been evaluated by research and development.When completed the investigation will be updated with the risk details.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Reporting based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of 'thumbwheel malfunctions during deployment'' and 'stent fracture'.The stent went in okay and when deploying the stent on the thumbwheel, the mechanism in the device broke.The thumbwheel would spin without any action on the stent.The physician treated it as a pin and pull and was able to deploy the device successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Cook ireland ltd (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of (b)(4).Exemption number: e2016031.(b)(4).Pma/510(k) #p100022/s014.A follow-up mdr is being submitted to include the device evaluation details.The zisv6-35-125-6-120-ptx device of lot number c1390840 involved in this complaint was returned for evaluation, without the original packaging.With the information provided, a physical examination and document based investigation was conducted.From customer testimony, it is known that the complaint device was used with a roadrunner wire guide, of 0.014¿ diameter which was switched for a quartus emerald wire.The complaint device was flushed prior to use.The stent was eventually deployed.The target lesion was severely calcified.Pre-dilation was conducted prior to stent deployment.Further information was received from the customer.The complaint device was advanced from a contralateral, femoral access approach, through a six french 45cm access sheath.The target location was the distal superficial femoral artery (sfa).Details of the patients weight or height are unknown.The district manager cannot confirm the details of the quartus emerald wire guide, which was either 0.018¿ or 0.035¿ diameter.It is unknown which wire guide was used with the complaint device during deployment.On evaluation of the returned device, it was observed that the device was returned with the safety trigger depressed, and without the stent.The distal end of the stent retraction sheath (srs) was significantly shape set in a coil, with crinkles on the sheath at a 5mm pitch.A kink was observed in the stability sheath, 23.5cm from the strain relief.The engineers used the thumbwheel mechanism, which spun freely.The handle was opened, and the stent retraction wire was observed separated from the stent retraction sheath.Complaint is confirmed as the failure was verified in the laboratory.The stent retraction wire was observed separated from the stent retraction sheath.Possible causes for this occurrence include the severely calcified lesion, or the use of an incorrect wire guide.The difficult anatomy could have created resistance during deployment, which could have led to the shape set coiling and the crinkles in the stent retraction sheath.The incorrect wire guide could have provided insufficient support during deployment.These factors could have caused or contributed to the retraction wire separating from the stent retraction sheath during deployment.However, as the conditions of use cannot be replicated in a laboratory environment, a definitive root cause for this occurrence cannot be determined.It can be noted that as per the product instructions for use: ¿a 0.035 inch (0.89mm) diameter wire guide should be used during tracking, deployment and removal in order to ensure adequate support of the system.¿ prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.Upon review of complaints, this failure mode has not occurred previously with this lot number.Based on the information available to date, there is no evidence to suggest that there are any manufacturing issues associated with lot number c1390840.According to information provided, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
A follow-up mdr is being submitted to include the device evaluation details.Initial report details: the stent was advanced successfully and when deploying the stent on the thumbwheel, the mechanism in the device broke.The thumbwheel would spin without any action on the stent.The physician treated it as a pin and pull and was able to deploy the device successfully.Reporting based on the device malfunction reporting precedence for this device family for the issue of 'thumbwheel malfunctions during deployment'' and 'stent fracture'.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX 35 DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
michael galvin
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
061334440
MDR Report Key6976185
MDR Text Key90993635
Report Number3001845648-2017-00484
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
UDI-Device Identifier10827002384825
UDI-Public(01)10827002384825(17)180620(10)C1390840
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Medical Technologist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG38482
Device Catalogue NumberZISV6-35-125-6-120-PTX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/27/2017
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/27/2017
Initial Date FDA Received10/25/2017
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/25/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/22/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/18/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-