• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MALEM MEDICAL MALEM ULTIMATE BEDWETTING ALARM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MALEM MEDICAL MALEM ULTIMATE BEDWETTING ALARM Back to Search Results
Device Problems Melted (1385); Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problem Burn, Thermal (2530)
Event Date 10/19/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The malem bedwetting alarm is the worst product that i have ever purchased.I thought he would overcome bedwetting, instead the alarm overheated and the back of the alarm melted and burnt my child.My child had to be rushed to the hospital.I have seen multiple similar complaints about this product online.Then why has no action been taken as yet against this company.Are you waiting for a child to get critically hurt or get handicapped for life? my child is hurt and i don't know how i am going to pay the hospital bills.I need to know: why did the alarm get hot? why was this product not inspected? when will the fda take action? to help you take action, i bought the malem ultimate bedwetting alarm from (b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MALEM ULTIMATE BEDWETTING ALARM
Type of Device
MALEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MALEM MEDICAL
MDR Report Key6983153
MDR Text Key90519068
Report NumberMW5072973
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KPN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/25/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age5 YR
-
-